Saturday, June 28, 2014

Photojournalism 2014 Style: Getting the Word-Out & Getting the People Involved

Wilson Hicks
“Its elements used in combination do not produce a third and new medium.  Instead, they form a complex in which each of the components retains its fundamental character, since words are distinctly one kind of medium, pictures another.  Of various dissimilarities in the mediums the one most pertinent to understanding of the photojournalistic technique is to be found in the ways in which they activate certain subjective responses in the reader.”
Wilson Hicks
 Photographic Communication: Principles, Problems and Challenges of Photojournalism  p. 19

 Wilson Hicks was the photographic editor of Life Magazine  from 1937 to 1950.  It was Hicks who built the photography staff at Life Magazine  from 4 to 40. He was also a professor of photojournalism at the University of Miami from 1955 to 1970.  In many way Hicks can be considered one of the fathers / mothers of photojournalism.  He understood this delicate marriage between the still photograph and the power of the printed word.  The picture didn’t stand alone in the context of the story but rather the picture served as a key component of the story; the picture took center stage while being surrounded by a caption and written copy.  As Hicks says in the quote above these two mediums weren’t melted into a third medium but rather they were two distinct mediums that serve to “activate certain subjective responses in the reader.”  It is interesting that he calls the subject reacting “the reader.”  Isn’t the reader also a viewer?  The subject that engages these mediums are viewing and reading, reading and viewing, while being moved as the story is constructed in such a way to provoke movement.  The work of photojournalism is to achieve a “subject response” from the viewer / reader.  The goal of my work is to take this principle of “provoking a subjective response in my viewer / reader”  specifically in response to social stratification and gentrification in the Atlanta area.

Hicks and his team of photographers and editors were very intentional about their work.  They had a   They constructed their “picture stories” in such away to advance their cause.  I look back on this time with romantic rose-colored glasses. Once I clean my glasses off and situate myself in the present I ask myself, “How can I do what Hicks and his team did in the time of Life Magazine?”  I answer myself by saying:
point of view, they didn’t claim some unachievable objectivity.
       1. You must create / make images that are so moving and compelling that they demand that the viewer stop, look and ask questions.
       2. You must create a community conversation around the issues you feel passionate about and that need to be addressed.
    3. You must use the tools you have at your disposal in this age to get the word-out.  The magazine as we knew it no longer exist but in an age of social media / multi-media you can and must communicate in new and timely ways.  The community of concerned activists citizens can be developed and sustained via virtual mediums.
      4. You must become an activist in regards to the issue(s) you feel passionate about.

The model of Life Magazine and Wilson Hicks was founded on iconic  images arranged in the format of story that served to move the reader.  It is this story format that will work today.  We are wired for story and the power is in the story as told via the images and multi / mixed media that both informs and moves those who engage the work.  What is the historical foundation your work is built upon?  How are you updated that foundation to work in a changed world?   

BBC Documentary on Life Magazine

The photographers who did the work!
http://life.time.com/photographers/



Monday, June 23, 2014

Change or Be Left Behind!

Stephen Mayes
“Although some changes are painful, we have a rare and privileged opportunity to challenge the conventions that have limited the understanding of photography, and to create new models of visual storytelling.”
Stephen Mayes
“Toward a New Documentary Expression” in Aperture 214, p, 33


Stephen Mayes pushes me to think about how I share the story I am trying to tell. The story of Sweet Auburn is a story rooted in history that is being propelled into the future.  The question we must raise is, “Will we forget?”  Mayes argues that we have to tell powerful stories and place in the context of where our people are comfortable (Flickr, Vine, YouTube, Vimeo, Facebook, Twitter, blogosphere).  This means that we can no longer wait for people to find us but rather we must take our message to the people and find our audience.  While Mayes is referencing photography his message transcends photography.  Mayes is saying to us that the world has changed; we have to find away to live into this change and allow this changing time to change us.

The wonderful privileged time I live in, as a storyteller is that I don’t have to wait for a publication or broadcaster to pick up my story.  I can use the tools at my fingertips to tell my story.  Not only can I use the tools at my fingertips but I can also tell more dynamic stories by using a multi / mixed media approach to storytelling.  Moreover if I have the time I can spend time on my story and tell a story over time and not reduce it to a sound bite or single news / documentary story.  I embrace the times and challenge that Mayes lays out.  The question for you and us is are we embracing the changing times in your industry(s)?  How are you changing what you do to take what you do to the people? How will you allow the way the world has changed – change you so that you can hear and be heard?




Tuesday, June 17, 2014

What Does It Mean to Black and Free in America in 2014?

What Does It Mean to Be Free?


What is the question?


This past Saturday I attended a panel discussion at the Auburn Research Library, “The Illusion of Freedom: The Reality of Black Life in America Since the Emancipation Proclamation”.  It was one of those panels that we could sit and engage in meaningful conversation for days, not just hours.  What does it mean to be free in an economic system built on the foundation of capitalism that is inherently unjust and profits off underpaying those it uses to make profits?  Can we find true freedom in a system that is inherently oppressive?  We can argue for African American entrepreneurship and our patronizing these businesses, which I support, but in doing so are we not right back into the trap of capitalism?  I wonder if we can talk about a mitigated freedom in the bowels of capitalism that serves us well in the form of psychological, spiritual and emotional freedom.  While I thoroughly enjoy these types of panels and discussions I always come away wondering if we are asking the right questions.  The brilliance on the panel was amazing and the questions they discussed were moving.  It was important to have this conversation on the sacred ground of Sweet Auburn because it reminded us of the limitations of capitalism and freedom as it relates to history and memory.  When economic wealth is the goal and a key component of how we understand and define freedom we have to then ask the question what does wealth do to memory, relationship, ethics, morals and communal freedom?  How do we connect the dots to define what freedom is and how do we work together collectively to achieve it?

We Are Ready to Talk About IT!


What are they talking about?






































Really...I don't have a problem with ...well yes I do....

Monday, June 9, 2014

How Sweet It Is: Pop Up Shops and Sweet Auburn

Let's Ride


This weekend marked the opening of the pop-up shops along Sweet Auburn.  The vibe on the street this Saturday was new and alive but not yet full.  I spent most of my time at Civil Bikes.  Civil Bikes is closest to the historic center of Sweet Auburn and they are trying to hold onto that history as it is a part of the next chapter.  As I walk along the street on Saturday while the shops are spread out you could sense the future, you could see it, smell it and feel it.  The true next chapter of Sweet Auburn is firmly in the oven and the flour is about to become cake.





Wednesday, June 4, 2014

The Crime Scene: 1 Dead and 4 Wounded and the Next Chapter Begins

1 Dead and Four Wounded

I woke up yesterday the news story that there was a shooting at Auburn and Bell!  What?  I am on my way to that very spot.  I arrive and the crime scene is still being processed.  The police are there, the new stations are there and I can't get through.  As I walk around crime scene and do my daily walk up Auburn Avenue I encounter another scene that is being monitored by police.  It is the scene of contractors doing the final work that will bring the Atlanta Streetcar to life.  The police officer is there to manage the traffic flow as the contractors are putting cables under the street.  Is this also a crime scene?  Is it a crime to gentrify?  Is gentrification a part of what every city has to go through?  How do we usher in the next chapter of the future of Sweet Auburn while not forgetting its history?  I don't know the answers to the questions I am raising but I do know that the police were at both ends on the street yesterday.  




The News Coverage: